February 01, 2007

Legislation Update for Texas Homeschoolers

Texas Animation

Just wanted to give everyone a head's up on this new bill introduced into the Texas legislature that may affect homeschool kids. If you live in Texas, won't you take a few moments to pick your phone up and call this senator's office (I did). Let them know that it should be up to the parent to decide when the child is ready to start Kindergarten.

Here's the update from HSLDA:

Dear Texas members and friends,

As in last session, a bill has been introduced in the Texas legislature which would increase the control that government has over children by mandating that children must begin school when they are only 5 years old. If passed, Senate Bill 52 would lower the compulsory attendance age from 6 years to 5 years. This would mean that all children, including homeschoolers, would be subject to the authority of truant officers one more year.

We hope your calls will cause the sponsor to NOT bring this bill up for a vote.


Please call the sponsor of the bill, Sen. Judith Zaffirini, (512) 463-0121, and give her this message:

"Please abandon your efforts to lower the age of compulsory school attendance in Senate Bill 52. It forces children to school before they are ready and takes the important decision of when each child is ready for school away from the parents, who best know their child's needs."

You do not need to identify that you homeschool.

Reasons For Opposing Lower Compulsory Attendance Age:

> Many education experts have concluded that beginning a child's formal education too early may actually result in burnout and poor scholastic performance later.

> Lowering the compulsory attendance age from 6 to 5 would subject Texas home educators to the requirements of the homeschool statute one year earlier. (You do not need to share this reason with your legislators.)

> Lowering the compulsory attendance age erodes the authority of parents who are in the best position to determine when their child's formal education should begin.

> Another significant impact of expanding the compulsory attendance age would be an inevitable tax increase to pay for more classroom space and teachers to accommodate the additional students compelled to attend public schools. When California increased the age of compulsory attendance, unwilling students were so disruptive that new schools had to be built just to handle them and their behavior problems, all at the expense of the taxpayer.

For more information on compulsory attendance, please see our memorandum.


Christopher J. Klicka, Esq.
Senior Counsel

Buzz Words: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Anonymous said...

Here in Europe, they start to teach to read, write, math and a foreign language at 4, and it seems good, small children are like sponges,and is much easier to learn as a small child then later on when they already formed a routine and it is more difficult to introduce changes..of course that doesn't mean that they are going to read Shakespeare at 5, but if they start with the basics like is a game, is going to be easier to increase the studies little by little, and wont be a trauma going at once at 6...is quite strange for me sometimes asking simple question in english to my nephew of 4 and a half, considering that they tought it to me at 11..and I can assure you that my life would have been easier if I would have started at 4!

Sprittibee said...

Oh, I certainly agree that kids should LEARN as early as 2,3,4,& 5. My children were reading well at 5 and are reading on a junior high or highschool level now (in elementary). :) I just think their parents should be the ones teaching them. Both of my kids were reading and learning at 4. :) I think it is none of the government's business when a child is put in school. They already have a law that states that children should be in school by the age of 6. I feel that they should leave what isn't broken alone and not try to fix it. :)

I'm not against learning young. I'm against Uncle Sam TELLING ME WHEN AND HOW TO LEARN.



Some posts on this blog contain affiliate links or sponsored links. I receive a small commission whenever a product is purchased through an affiliate link. Sponsored links are paid for by a company who wishes to improve their Google ranking, but I always check to make sure these are reputable sites and never allow any links that are questionable to be placed.

The links in my "Sweet Linkage" section are either sponsored links or personal links that I find interesting (including the links to the blogs that both of my teen children run).

I occasionally run ads on my blog in exchange for money or traded advertising, or receive products in exchange for a review or giveaway posts. I also participate in campaigns by brands that offer to pay me to write about their products after using them. Any post that is sponsored will be noted as such. All opinions expressed on Sprittibee.com are my own, and any review, give-away, sponsored post, graphic ad, or product that I mention or link to are ones that I believe are reputable and worthy companies.


blog design:

blog archives